Monday, 13 May 2024

The Rituals of the Spirit (Part 2)


There is a way of knowing in ritual that you cannot get through other means… If this thesis is right or even plausible and your life is empty of ritual, that means there are ways of knowing yourself and the world that you are cut off from now— 

John Vervaeke 


In Part 1 of The Rituals of the Spirit, I consider spirituality, i.e. the rituals of the spirit, from an energetic perspective. I lay claim that “everything is energy” and our awareness of the energetic charge behind everything we encounter may help us become more aware of some of the ways that we do not use our energy optimally. We, unwittingly, give away a considerable amount of our energy, and it is through rituals of the spirit, where we may begin to regain our energetic power, and use it with intention in the pursuit of our goals. 


In Part 2, we take an entirely different route, through dark forests, valleys and caves. Spirituality is a matter of life or death, both literally and figuratively. When we do not have a spiritual practice, then we die. We wither away like dried-up leaves or become dispersed like a handful of sand in the wind. We become disorientated and lose our way, not being able to break the surface of the deep sea, called Life, that we’ve been unceremoniously thrust into.    


Christian evangelist Leonard Hill said that Jesus Christ did not come into the world to make bad people good, He came to make dead men live. This is what spirituality is about, the practice of choosing life, day in and day out. It is not about ‘being right,’ it is about cultivating wisdom so that the decisions we make about ourselves and others help us to move away from self-destruction and self-deception. The word ‘spirituality’ is derived from the Latin word ‘spiritus’ which means ‘breath’. In this essay, I explore the many different places that this breath can show up in our lives and how it can be life-giving if we can just… well, breathe. 


On Respiration

Then “Moses says to God, ‘What is your name?’ And God responds, ‘Moses, you tell them the LORD sent you.’ Now this name, LORD, if you’re reading it in an English translation of the Bible, the name is spelled capital L, capital O, capital R, capital D. The name appears in the Bible over 6,000 times. But it wasn’t originally written in the English language, it was written in the Hebrew language. And in Hebrew the name is essentially four letters. We would say Y, H, V, H [the tetragrammaton]. But in Hebrew, the letters are pronounced: ‘Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh.’ Some pronounce the name ‘Yahweh’ or ‘Yahveh,’ although in many traditions the name isn’t even pronounced, because it’s considered so sacred, so mysterious, so holy. In fact, the ancient rabbis believed that these letters actually functioned kind of as vowels in the Hebrew language. They believed that they were kind of breathing sounds and that ultimately the name is simply unpronounceable because the letters together are essentially the sound of breathing. Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh. Is the name of God the sound of breathing?” In the Bible, the word for ‘breath’ is the same word as the word for ‘spirit.’ In the Hebrew language it’s the word ‘ruah,’ in the Greek language, it’s the word ‘pneuma.’ One Scripture says that when God takes away the ‘ruah,’ the breath of all living creatures, then they die and return to dust. But when God sends the ‘ruah,’ the Spirit, they are created. Breath, Spirit, same word. When you let God in, when you breathe, what happens is you become aware of all the things you need to leave behind, everything you need to let go of.” If you were to be totally honest about what’s going on inside of you, is there anything you need right now to breathe out?”


I watched Rob Bell’s Breathe video in my early varsity days, when Michael Jackson was still alive, which is surprising that during a recent conversation with a friend, I was able to recall the sensory experiences of the video in alarming detail. I could see his face, with the black eyeglasses and remember that he was on the subway. It has really remained with me all of these years.

***

On a balmy Floridian day in 1968, a famous bottlenose dolphin that had brought joy to many children, swam up to where her trainer was sitting with his legs wading in the water. She put her head in his arms, stopped breathing and subsequently died. Kathy was the dolphin that had played the much-adored Flipper on TV. Once the show was over however, Kathy was kept in captivity where a tiny tank became her new home. Ric O’ Barry, in interviews, describes how he could see that she was in anguish and describes her death as a suicide. Turns out that cetaceans take conscious breaths, unlike human beings who breathe unconsciously. It is this unconscious nature of human breathing that makes it easy to take it for granted, just like the young fish in David Foster Wallace’s speech, who are completely unaware of the water that they are swimming in. We forget that breathing is the essence and that the human body cannot perform any acts without this constant supply of breath or air that we are ‘swimming’ in. People like Wim Hof, James Nestor, Travis Elliot or Sam Harris have done an excellent job in returning us to breath. Breath is essentially the very beginning, the middle, and the very end of our existence. It is all encompassing, and it is the entire story. And yet, years can go by without sparing a thought to it. WILD! 


To take us a step further, it is not just that breath gives life but it attunes, enhances, brings out the very best out of our lives and ourselves. It is not this one-dimensional or passive entity, it itself lives and injects vitality into every part of us. In the Bible, the Holy Spirit comforts, empowers, enriches, edifies, guides, heals, clarifies, strengthens, perfects, protects, provides, produces fruit, enlightens, ennobles and transforms. There is more to what it does than this but I think I have ‘three dimensionalized’ it, brought it to life in a way. The spirit does not just give us life, it enlivens us in every sense of the word. When we do not open our lungs (souls) to its capacity, then there are limits to the power we can tap into. When we are living shallowly (shallow-breathing), we cannot change the temperature of a room like Wim Hof can, or dive to death-defying depths of the ocean like free-divers can. We cannot access the calm of the eye of the storm, run an ultramarathon, take in that large breath of courage to ask the girl we like out on a date or ask our boss for a raise. Without intentionality behind our ways of breathing, invoking God with every exhale and inhale, how can we even ascend enough to kiss His face? Or as Lupe Fiasco puts it, summon the forest and talk to the trees? Deep calls unto deep, and without this intentionality, we may never hear this call. “When you are no longer able to say the name of God… you die” (Rob Bell). 


Breathing is a two part process, you take in what your body needs and then expel what you don’t need. Most of us are of the opinion that the most important part of breathing is the inhale but there is a general consensus among scientists that we breathe because of a carbon dioxide build-up. If we take this a step further, then we can interpret this as a metaphorical need to breathe out the bad stuff so that we can let the good stuff in. “God is always trying to give good things to us,” wrote St. Augustine, “but our hands are too full to receive them.” Before we can get the new, the old has to go. Before we can thrive, we have to do away with all the beliefs, perspectives, methods that no longer serve us, as they say. In order to be born again, parts of ourselves need to die. More often than not, we are held back by things that we need to let go of, rather than things we need to grab onto. There is a saying that what got us to this point, won’t be sufficient to take us to the next place, in every and any part of our lives. 


Professor of Kinesiology, Andy Galpin, explains the ability to stay in shape in a similar way. We burn fat through respiration. He explained that everything that we eat, that is used as fuel or stored within our cells as fat is made of carbon. The name of the macronutrient carbohydrate gives this away. Therefore the carbon in the carbon dioxide that we breathe out comes from the food that we eat. The more carbon we expel through cardiovascular exercise then the more fat we burn. Even weight loss is the process of releasing carbon that no longer serves us. 


There are many things that we carry with us, from childhood trauma to relationship drama, that can really slow us down. Our shoulders are overladen with crosses we have no business carrying. Others of us, knowing that becoming unburdened may lighten us, refuse to shrug the world off of our shoulders, because we know that there will no longer be any circumstances behind which we can possibly hide. Our pasts have become a convenient alibi, letting us off the hook so that we truly do not have to engage with life. We close ourselves to any aspirations and any potential failures that may come along for that particular ride. We play it safe and live small dormant lives. 


There is a tree called the Ziziphus mucronata that McCallum draws attention to in Ecological Intelligence which is quite remarkable. This tree appears in every culture in South Africa and each culture has a different name for it, which I find rather interesting because all the different names for it converge in a beautiful way. Before I go into the different meanings, it is worthwhile to first describe the physical appearance of the tree because a lot of meaning has been derived from it as well. “The thorns of the tree Ziziphus mucronata are spaced along the length of every branch in pairs,” writes McCallum. “One of the pair points robustly outward and forward while the other curves back and inward in the opposite direction.” In the meta-scheme of things, the tree is called the tree of life which is salient for so many reasons.

In an artitle titled Umphafa: What is in a name?, the Umphafa Nature Reserve writes:

The leaves and fruit of this tree are sought after by many birds and animals. Giraffes are especially fond of the leaves and even dead leaves that have fallen to the ground will often be eaten by animals such as impala, so little is wasted. A tasty spinach can be made from boiling the leaves and honey can be found in the flowers. During the Boer war the seeds of the fruit were ground to make a coffee substitue and you can even make beer from the fruit if fermented properly. Medicinally, an extract from the roots can be used as a painkiller on external complaints such as boils, sores, glandular, and chest swellings. With all these different uses it is an important tree to have in abundance on the reserve... In some regions of South Africa, it is believed that the tree is immune to lightning therefore it will be chosen as a tree to shelter under if caught in a storm. It is also believed that if it is felled in the summer months then great droughts will follow. Some tribes will use the tree to make kraals or hedges in which they will keep their livestock to protect them from lions and other predators.

The tree is used to lead spirits of those who have died from the place of death, home. In isiXhosa, the tree is referred to as Umlahlankosi, under which a chief is buried. There is something here that connects the tree with the wisdom as chiefs are seens as intermediaries between people and the highest authorities. One of my favorite rappers, Zakwe, in his song with Duncan AMA Level, drops a few bars on this legendary tree. They don't call him the Shaka Zulu of Rap for nothing, this guy has his finger on the pulse on all things significant.


I am a super nerd when it comes to symbolism so allow me a little indulgence here. In the garden of Eden, when God cursed the land, he introduced the thorn bush into the ‘ecosystem’. When God appeared to Moses through the burning bush, it was a thorn tree. The crown that is placed on Jesus’ head in the passion is made of thorns therefore, in his crucifixion he vindicates the thorn tree. The apostle Paul in the new testament refers to a “thorn in his flesh” which most scholars believe to be epilepsy. There is some aspect of reality that is disclosed through the symbolism of thorns and it does not surprise me that this very tree of life should be made of thorns. The tree highlights the dualistic or paradoxical nature of life. It is a life-giving tree which also presents hardship and suffering. It has a thorn pointing forwards to the future and another one pointing backwards towards the past; reflection and aspiration. Rootedness and ascendance, soul and spirit. The Afrikaans people of South Africa refer to this tree as the “wag ‘n bietjie (wait just one moment)” tree which is a stark reminder that reflection plays a critical part in the process of moving forward. It is only once we have truly reflected, then can we begin to truly move forward. Without reflection, then how can we know for sure that we are indeed moving forward as opposed to spinning in circles of pathology? In my home language, seTswana, the Ziziphus mucronata is known as the mokgalo which translates to ‘space’ or ‘gap’, the in-between of respiration, the space between the exhalation and the inhalation, a primordial pause, a “wag-ing” as it were. Across the different cultures, the name of the tree points to respiration and aspiration. It provides a throughline through our past and our future, a lifeline that connects us so that we are not archipelagos of patterns of behavior adrift at sea, but anchored and grounded in a reality that moves us forward in meaningful ways. The tree points us to spirit but also to soul. 


McCallum, in brilliant fashion, shares the story of how ‘soul’ became subsumed under ‘spirit’ when they are two different things. Most of us are unable to differentiate between spirit and soul and we treat them interchangeably. McCallum writes how when Jesus was born, the god Pan was declared dead. Pan was representative of Pagan beliefs or perhaps of polytheism and Jesus Christ’s birth silenced all the other gods. When Pan died, so did soul for that matter. Soul, which symbolizes depth, rootedness, warmth, creativity and femininity were incorporated into a masculine spirit. Our feet were levitated off the ground by spirit and lost our moorings with the earth. Our minds and hearts could only occupy themselves with the heavenly and we alienated ourselves from the nature from which we came. It has been said that man cannot live on bread alone, but let us not forget that among the many things that man lives on, bread is indeed still one of them. And so, in the year 869, when the Nicene Creed, of which I am familiar having been raised Anglican, was finalized in Constantinople. Psychologist James Hillman describes how the Nicene Creed was the cement poured over the casket in which soul was buried. “Our notion of a tripartite cosmos of spirit, soul and body, devolved into a dualism of spirit (or mind) and body (or matter). What the Constantinople Council did to soul, rejecting this image, only culminated a long process beginning with Paul, the Saint, of substituting and disguising, and, forever after, confusing soul with spirit.” When I was working through The Psychology of Money course, one of the activities had to do with identifying my own values by noticing what I value in other individuals. I wrote, in my journal, that I deeply admired the writer Teju Cole for his rootedness. That coupled with my sheer fascination with trees may just be the string that tugs at the heart of the kite that is myself, keeping me from spiralling into my existential condition and keeping me from completely disappearing into the skies on intellectual alienation. “A miracle was the tree, something in front of which humans should kneel, humbly, in the silent amazement which, in reality, is sister to worship,” C Louis Leipoldt.


It is worth noting, Zakwe’s second album is titled Impande (the root), his third album titled Cebisa (the one who shares wisdom), and the first single from his forthcoming album is titled Isihlalo Sobukhosi (the throne) all highlight so many dimensions of the ziziphus. There is both an Aristotelian vertical ascent of aspiration and actualization coupled with the reflectiveness and rootedness of soul.  

Spirit and soul are not the same. Like the rows of thorns on the ziziphus, they anticipate each other. They are complementary opposites. Spirit is cool, pointed, and soaring. It gives us wings. Soul is Earthbound and warm. It gives us roots. It loves the Earth and everything that comes out of it. Soul knows about the shadow. And as any-one involved in healing will tell you, the wounds of the spirit are most often healed by soul (McCallum).      

Aspirations

My blog is titled “The Becoming of Lebogang Moeketsi” because it is a loose chronicle of my becoming. Like the ship of Theseus, I am always being changed, and yet remaining Lebogang Moeketsi throughout these changes. My values have changed over the years and will continue to do so particularly because I am continually engaging in aspirational projects; projects of self-transcendence. My becoming, however, is not something that has an end point, I ‘become’ in perpetuity. The end point does not even matter to me, I let infinity take care of itself; my main concern is living in such a way that with every passing year, I seek out transformative experiences which help me see myself, others and God a little bit more clearly. D.H Lawrence put it so well when he wrote: 

That I am I. That my soul is a dark forest that strange gods come forth from the forest into the clearing of my known self, and then go back. That I must have the courage to let them come and go. That I will never let mankind put anything over me, but that I will always try to recognize and to honor the gods in me and the gods in other men and women. There is my creed. 


Author of Aspiration: The Agency of Becoming, Agnes Callard, describes aspiration as the rational process by which we work to care about (or love, or value, or desire…) something new. Projects of aspiration require a degree of resistance, letting go of old values and aiming for new ones is difficult. Old values are readily at hand, while new ones are yonder, there, by the horizon. Hard work is an aspirational necessity, it cannot be circumvented in any way. No one else can take on aspirational projects for you either. It is your work if it is to transform you in any way. 


Last year, a “Dr Matthew Lani” trended in South Africa after he was exposed for impersonating a doctor, going as far as selling medication and offering medical advice on social media platforms. While becoming a doctor may have been an aspiration of Lani’s, he did not do the necessary work required for him to realize that aspiration. Perhaps he wanted the money, and prestige afforded to those who wear white robes with stethoscopes hanging around their necks, but becoming a “doctor” for Lani was more about living up to the values he already had, as opposed to attaining new values. He had always valued money and prestige over everything else which is why impersonating a doctor seemed a viable way for him to connect himself with that money and prestige. Doctors who swear by the hippocratic oath actually care about helping people, and clearly Lani did not care about the people he gave medical advice and sold medication to, because if he had cared about them, that line of action would be completely unthinkable. He is actually willing to put their lives in danger for the bells and whistles associated with the medical profession. That is not an aspiration, as there is no self-transcendence here. In fact, quite the contrary was achieved through the whole debacle, he debased himself. Let’s remember the words of Jim Rohn here, when he said that what’s important is not getting the million, it is what it makes of you to achieve the million. Most lottery winners are back where they started a year after winning the lottery, because winning the lottery was not a transformative experience. Without, there was huge change, within, not so much. Old values remain readily at hand. 


When we are willing to “lie, cheat and steal” our way to [fill in the blank], then we are just ambitious, but we are not aspirants. We are no different from Macbeth, Lady Macbeth, Frank and Claire Underwood… cautionary tales, every single one of them. “For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?” 


Callard also writes, “we all drift and change in response to our environment, cultural pressures, etc. Sometimes, we change without even noticing it. The aspirant’s movement is not of this kind, since she actively moves herself.” This means, when we use our family names or golf-club networks or game the system to climb certain ladders or gain access to certain privileges, or hold gala’s to donate to charities, we are playing the ambition game. I can respect a hustle as a hustle, but let us not kid ourselves into thinking it is anything deeper, anything substantial, anything transformative irrespective of how many zeroes accompany that hustle. I recently learned that the word ‘vicious’ comes from the word ‘vice,’ I had a duh moment. I’ve come to see that the most vicious of us in this country are those of us who have vested interests and are willing, tooth and nail, to protect those interests. When we are spending most of our waking hours courting vice, when do virtuous projects of aspiration begin? But, I digress. 


Callard brings up the conflicted aspirant in her book, which is someone who has aspirations but has a hard time letting go of the old values. They feel the tug within that whispers to them to follow a certain path but they ignore it or dismiss it as being too much hard work. We’ve all experienced it but not all of us follow our Campbellian bliss. Perhaps we are afraid of what others will think of us or afraid of failing and looking stupid or any of the other emotional permutations that we may experience in these types of situations. The problem is this is a recipe for regret, as we will always be plagued by the call. Even though no one else can hear the spirit swirling around within us, we know what we need to do. We cannot escape our aspirations, they torment us like hungry ghosts, flipping over the pictures on the walls of our interiority, begging for us to pay attention to them. “If you follow your bliss, you put yourself on a kind of track that has been there all the while, waiting for you,” writes Joseph Campbell. “And the life that you ought to be living is the one you are living.”  This is what the aspirational life offers us, the meaning-enriching feeling that even though being an aspirant is difficult, it is precisely what we should be doing with our lives at this particular juncture. It is also good work because it transforms us for the better. Truly transformative experiences are in part transformative because we can never truly comprehend what it is we receive until we actually receive the fruits of the aspirational labor. Our imaginations can only take us so far, it is only until we are fully immersed in our aspirational efforts when bundles of boundless joy reach our shores. “As time goes on, however, the fact (if it is a fact) that we are still at it is usually a sign that we find ourselves progressively more able to see, on our own, the value that we could barely apprehend at first. This is how we work our way into caring about the many things that we, having done that work, care about,” writes Callard.

Inspiration

While in conversation with John Vervaeke, Jordan B. Peterson explains that the word ‘slogan’ is derived from words that essentially mean ‘the battle cry of the dead.’ Sloganeering, itself, is something that is met with contempt because it rings hollow and loud like a tin can. In the prologue of Martin Buber’s I and Thou, Walter Kaufmann writes that some books are stillborn which describes dead books. Living books are books that stand the test of time, they are books which we can continuously return to at different times in our lives and they keep our hearts beating. Nassim Taleb, ever the one to give advice, says that the books that we should be reading are those that are still relevant at least a decade after being published. These are the books that are inspired. Herein lies the fundamental difference between motivation and inspiration. The reason that motivation can not take us far is that the words are dying as they leave the lips of the motivational speaker. “In the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the word was God,” the book of John reads. When the gutenberg press opened the printing flood gates, the Bible became the best selling book of all time. This should come as no surprise since Jesus Christ was no motivational speaker. Jesus Christ ‘achieved’, according to the Hip Hop artist Nipsey Hussle, the highest human act which is to inspire. Jesus Christ came to give life, to inspire with a new breath. This is why the Bible, and other canonical religious texts, for that matter, remain perennial bestsellers. They are living and have the ability to midwife life-altering, life-affirming and long-lasting changes within people. Inspiration works from the inside while motivation tries to work from the outside in. The act of inspiration shakes us up and opens us up for a time where we can decide to take it upon ourselves to decide whether we are going to sow the seed of change within us or not. No one is telling us what decision to take or what to do, but it is ultimately up to us to use that inspiration in a positive way. Motivation is a shift of personal responsibility where we expect other people to rally us up to engage in truly meaningful experiences which undermines the entire enterprise of taking personal responsibility for our lives making it short lived as well. 


In the podcast episode titled The Neuroscience of Speech, Language and Music, Andrew Huberman interviews Dr. Erich Jarvis who explains in great detail how human beings sang before they spoke. As an African, this insight was embraced with the familiarity and the openhearted warm welcome of a beloved family member who has been away for a long time but has finally returned home. We are a singing and dancing people. It runs deep within us. I was listening to Zenzile: The Reimagination of Miriam Makeba by Somi and Thandiswa Mazwai’s Tiny Desk Concert performance recently. In Somi’s rendition of Makeba’s Pata Pata, she introduces the song with a 1969 interview of Makeba in Finland. When Makeba is asked if the people of South Africa are happy? She replies that black South Africans are happy because they continue to sing and dance. In 1969, the scourge of racism had a chokehold on the throats of black people in the country. Our spirits, as black people, were not broken because we still had a song in our throats and dance (making music with our bodies) tucked away in our hips. We survived because these primordial responses were far larger than our pain and could therefore assuage them, albeit momentarily, and see us to the next day. Singing and dancing were not just analgesics, they were also expressions of deep joy. If you would spend a little time in South Africa, you will observe that the ones who suffered the most are the most rooted and spirited and have truly mastered the ability to quaff from the deep well of joy that life can offer amidst heart-rending suffering. Ofcourse, as that lyric from The Eagles' Lyin’ Eyes goes, “every form of refuge has its price.” Prince Kaybee’s Fetch Your Life with Msaki on the vocals and Thebe’s Groover’s Prayer, (innocuous at first listen) touch on what happens when our strengths become dependencies but that is an essay for another day. For the most part, song and dance are things that have completed and strengthened the identity of the black people on this continent which is truly as beautiful as we are. 


And so in Lahl’Umlenze Thandiswa Mazwai sings, “ndinebhongo; ndiyaziquenya ngawe mzontsundu… thina siphila ngengoma (I am proud of you. I pride myself on you black nation… music is our life.) While books have played an undeniable and indispensable role in my becoming, music has been the grammar of my becoming. It has been the language through which I can make sense of the world around me and the way I form the deepest connections with the people around me. It has always been the way I know I am alive because through it, I have a rich history and a future worth moving towards. As I type this, Boom Shaka’s Lerato is streaming through my headphones. It, therefore, makes ontological sense to me that we were singing before we were speaking, from a phenomenological and existential perspective. In Richard “Humpty” Vission’s Alright, Devon’e sings “All I need is the music…. Everything will be alright.” I concur.

 

Singing is the living word, much like poetry whose rhythm beats in the heart of men and not in their vocal cords. It is song through which the muezzin calls men to prayer, restless babies are lulled to sleep with “hush little baby,” grief is collectively shared within the community to unladen the hearts of those personally aggrieved with “hamba ntliziyo yam’ (go, heart of mine, go). It was in an effort to resist the overpowering allure of the Siren’s song, where Odysseus tied himself to the mast of his ship and avoided a shipwreck. It is a reason why worship is an integral part of liturgy and also, on the other hand, why in Christian mythology, the devil is considered the angel of music. It is the magic in a movie like Happy Feet and a musical like Chicago. It is the stepping-inspiring gumboot dance of Southern African miners in the face of the harshest working and living conditions. It is the sixth sense of those on the spectrum as it was for Johannes Sebastian Bach. Nietzsche was on to something when he wrote that “we listen to music with our muscles.”  Steven Pinker referred to music as “auditory cheesecake,” Steven Jay Gould as an exaptation (instead of an adaptation) and William James as something that made its way into our minds “by the back stairs.” To me, music is more fundamental than that. It is the way that we humans have been able to express ourselves when words prove insufficient. It holds the entire gamut of human emotion, expression and communication, even those not known to us or those beyond our means of articulation. More than anything, music moves us, as Nietzsche reminded us, it is in our tendons, ligaments, bones, and fascia. It is physiological and when a song strikes a chord within us, all of a sudden possibility materializes before our very eyes, and our weary bones are brought to life with a vengeance. Ofcourse, music is not immune to mortality. There is music that is itself dead and which, as a consequence, slowly siphons us of the vitality we need to face life with enthusiasm. This is not the music I am referring to. Living music hearkens and responds to us as we do to it. It is dynamic and relational at the collective level but also at the individual’s quiet, and intimate level. 


Poetry offers us the same. When Rainer Maria Rilke encountered the bust of Apollo, it exhorted: “You must change your life” which are words that sit with all of Rilke’s readers. Words that can at times be uncomfortable, but oftentimes encouraging. Years later from the first time I read Rilke, there the words sit in the living room of my interiority gathering warmth, gently and patiently rocking back and forth, waiting for me to enter into dialogue with them. In his article titled Can Rilke Change Your Life? Kamran Javadizadeh expresses a similar effect that Rilke had on him:

I discovered that Rilke's poems were writing back to me. By that I mean not simply that the lines offered wisdom that was keyed to my (all-too-common) predicament, but rather that, as I read, my ordinary, incoherent life seemed artfully arranged there on the page ahead of me, point by suddenly luminous point. The poems were reading my mind and reflecting it back as someone else's poetry. Was I that someone else?


And so is the nature of poetry, which transforms us by questioning us. A questioning that does not paralyze us with insurmountable self- doubt but is revelatory in its way to point us towards our best selves. Great poetry explodes our universes and at the same time, shows us “how enormous [our] whole extent is, reaching all the way to the stars.” I find myself posing the same question that Javadizadeh posed. Am I that someone else? Am I not yet fully myself yet?

   

For McCallum, poetry is much more than a language, it is an attitude. The word poetry is derived from the word poema which means to create or to make. It is “the voice of those who can speak of anger and beauty in one breath… poetry comes at us from both sides, from the inside and from the out.” He continues:

If you are with me, you will understand that the poetry. I am interested in is not necessarily that of verse and rhyme. I am interested in the lines and images in the bones of the reader, that make children ask for a second reading and that stir the exhausted mindsets of civil servants who can’t wait until they retire. I am interested in the poems that can hold the tension and the wisdom between the words yes and no.


Poet Stephen Watson describes poetry as an act of the inherent human tendency to protest against all that wishes to confine, subjugate or mutilate the human spirit. Poetry is beyond ideology or the sloganeering of that which endeavors to totalize. It holds the infinite in the palm of its hands. E.O. Wilson writes that poetry is a vocation “committed to new ways of seeing things and of saying them.” It does not motivate; it inspires over and over again in new and different ways. It is the river of Heraclitus that knows no end, ever changing, becoming more of a river with each passing moment. 


David Ogilvy, Benjamin Disraeli, Michel de Montaigne, George Eliot, Charlie Munger, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Winston Churchill are some of the few names who vow by enthusiasm. They believe that human beings are truly alive when they are at their most enthusiastic. The word enthusiasm is derived from the enthusiasmos which means to be filled with the gods. The most enthusiastic people are the ones who are kissing the face of God. We are at our best when we are most enthusiastic. Those who have experienced flow know this. Flow is the culmination of respiration, aspiration and inspiration and what a breathtaking thing it is to behold. The rituals of the spirit are those that bring us closer to the gods because they bring us closer to what God had in mind when he created us, but they also bring us ever closer to reality, to our limitations. Our spirituality helps us ride the fine balance of life’s paradoxes while consciously maintaining our breath, with our hearts attuned aspirationally to the transcendentals, our bodies in song and dance, accompanied by the willingness to wipe the film off the mirror of our truest selves and get to authentically know them


All is Well

 If the descent is thus sometimes performed in sorrow, it can also take place in joy. This word is not too much. Again I fancy Sisyphus returning toward his rock, and the sorrow was in the beginning. When the images of earth cling too tightly to memory, when the call of happiness becomes too insistent, it happens that melancholy rises in man’s heart: this is the rock’s victory, this is the rock itself. The boundless grief is too heavy to bear. These are our nights of Gethsemane. But crushing truths perish from being acknowledged. Thus, Å’dipus at the outset obeys fate without knowing it. But from the moment he knows, his tragedy begins. Yet at the same moment, blind and desperate, he realizes that the only bond linking him to the world is the cool hand of a girl. Then a tremendous remark rings out: “Despite so many ordeals, my advanced age and the nobility of my soul make me conclude that all is well.” Sophocles’ Å’dipus, like Dostoevsky’s Kirilov, thus gives the recipe for the absurd victory. Ancient wisdom confirms modern heroism.

      One does not discover the absurd without being tempted to write a manual of happiness. “What! by such narrow ways—?” There is but one world, however. Happiness and the absurd are two sons of the same earth. They are inseparable. It would be a mistake to say that happiness necessarily springs from the absurd discovery. It happens as well that the feeling of the absurd springs from happiness. “I conclude that all is well,” says Å’dipus, and that remark is sacred. It echoes in the wild and limited universe of man. It teaches that all is not, has not been, exhausted. It drives out of this world a god who had come into it with dissatisfaction and a preference for futile sufferings. It makes of fate a human matter, which must be settled among men.

      All Sisyphus’ silent joy is contained therein. His fate belongs to him. His rock is his thing. Likewise, the absurd man, when he contemplates his torment, silences all the idols. In the universe suddenly restored to its silence, the myriad wondering little voices of the earth rise up. Unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and price of victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night. The absurd man says yes and his effort will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is but one which he concludes is inevitable and despicable. For the rest, he knows himself to be the master of his days. At that subtle moment when man glances backward over his life, Sisyphus returning toward his rock, in that slight pivoting he contemplates that series of unrelated actions which becomes his fate, created by him, combined under his memory’s eye and soon sealed by his death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind man eager to see who knows that the night has no end, he is still on the go. The rock is still rolling.

      I leave Sisyphus at the foot of the mountain! One always finds one’s burden again. But Sisyphus teaches the higher fidelity that negates the gods and raises rocks. He too concludes that all is well. This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither sterile nor futile. Each atom of that stone, each mineral flake of that night-filled mountain, in itself forms a world. The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man’s heart. 

One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

Excerpt from The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus

Saturday, 27 April 2024

From The Wayzgoose by Roy Campbell (1928)

There are only patterns, patterns on top of patterns, patterns that affect other patterns. Patterns hidden by patterns. Patterns within patterns. If you watch close, history does nothing but repeat itself. What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we can't decipher. what we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish. There is no free will. There are no variables. 

-Chuck Palahniuk

South Africa, renowned far and wide

For politics and little else beside:

Where, having torn the land with shot and shell, 

Our sturdy pioneers as farmers dwell,

And, 'twixt the hours of strenuous sleep, relax

To shear the fleeces or to fleece the blacks:

Where every year a fruitful increase bears 

Of pumpkin, sheep, and millionaires- 

A clime so prosperous to men and kine

That which were which a sage could scarce define;

Where fat white sheep upon the mountain bleat

And fatter politicians in the street;

Where lemons hang like yellow moons ashine

And grapes the size of apples load the vine;

Where apples to the load of pumpkins go

And donkeys to the height of statesmen grow,

Where trout the size of salmon throng the creeks

And worms the size of magistrates - the beaks; 

Where the precocious tadpole, from this bog, 

Becomes a journalist ere half a frog;

Where every shrimp his proud career may carve

And only brain and muscle have to starve. 

The 'Garden Colony' they call our land, 

And surely for a garden it was planned:

What apter phrase with such a place could cope

Where vegetation has so fine a scope,

Where weeds in such variety are found

And all the rarest parasites abound, 

Where pumpkins to professors are promoted

And turnips into parliament are voted.

Where else do men by vegetating vie

And run to seed so long before they die?



Thursday, 28 March 2024

Dreams


We are the only animals I know where food, water and air will never be enough for an existence that is meaningful and who have therefore learned to feed off their imagination and their dreams. 

Ian McCallum


 I climbed out of my own mouth

Down a mahogany staircase of quivering chin

To release the catch in my throat

So that courage can be coughed up

On to the silver plate of reality

To be served, as a sacrifice, back to Morpheus

With gleaming cutlery sharpened on old almosts 

What a feast it could be 


A regurgitation of recurrence that refuses to repent its realness

The resolve being a resurrection that removed its own rock from the mouth of the cave

Only to have my chest cave in under crosses of dreams deferred

With a pole, I raise in the sun, a bivouac tent of heart and ribs of the collapse

Caged, within and without, out of reach and yet too close to home

"Dreams, that's all there is."  


I can almost taste them in the air

A salty fragrance from the belch of whales which swallow dreams whole

Yes Msaki, I am at home in the land of the brave

In this ritually armoured body that rests and rises and rises again, facing east without being sunk

"Dreams, that's all there is."

Saturday, 9 March 2024

Wilderness by Ian McCallum

Have we forgotten

that wilderness is not a place,

but a pattern of soul

where every tree, every bird and beast

is a soul maker? 


Have we forgotten

that wilderness is not a place

but a moving feast of stars,

footprints, scales and beginnings? 


Since when

did we become afraid of the night

and that only the bright stars count? 

Or that our moon is not a moon

unless it is full? 


By whose command

were the animals

through groping fingers,

one for each hand,

reduced to the big and little five? 


Have we forgotten

that every creature is within us

carried by tides

of Earthly blood

and that we named them?


Have we forgotten

that wilderness is not a place,

but a season

and that we are in its

final hour? 


Saturday, 24 February 2024

The Rituals of The Spirit

Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms- to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.

David R. Hawkins


In the episode of Family Guy titled First Blood, Peter and the guy’s visit Mayor West’s dude ranch to become cowboys and develop their physical prowess. And what would a cowboy be without a horse? Just a man. One of the first things the men do is to get a horse. Peter excitedly attempts to pick a horse and Mayor West, in his deep sonorous voice, holds him back, “Hold on Peter,” West says. “Real cowboys don’t choose their horse; the horse chooses them.” It wouldn’t be Family Guy if any of the horses actually chose Peter. This theme runs throughout their entire stay at the ranch, “real cowboys don’t choose their cattle, the cattle choose them…” While Peter is repeatedly and hilariously rejected by every living thing on the ranch, there is something worth staying with in this theme beyond the humour. It reminds me of the Sorting Hat in Harry Potter. The rather facially expressive hat reads the energy or spirit of the person wearing the hat and decides which house they would be best suited to. Bottom line is that while we may think that we choose things, it is things that first choose us. I think this applies to all matter, from horses, dogs, and people, to places, cars, and books. 


I was browsing through books online and The Energy of Money by Maria Nemeth immediately grabbed my attention; and I am currently elbows and knees deep into it. I wasn’t even looking for a book on money, but the book chose me and that was that. There was something in me, immaterial, that the book identified and found resonance with. As I read this book, the idea that “everything is energy” concretized in my mind. Our eyes, which take up a lot of brain bandwidth, mislead us, they give us the impression that what we see is all there is to reality. If this weren’t the case, we would not be so enamoured with material possessions. While the things we see with our eyes are seductive, they are only one part of the story, a very small one. They are more at the tail end of the story arc of reality rather than being front and centre. They are the culmination and manifestation, the end-product of things that we cannot see. They are the tip of the iceberg.  


Many people have interpreted Joseph Campbell’s The Hero's Journey in many different ways and in her book, Nemeth explores the journey “energetically.” For her, a hero goes through the journey of taking nameless energy that we all have access to as human beings and channelling it with principles, converting it with our own standards of integrity and shaping it with intentions into goals realized. While her book is focused on money, Nemeth does note that this process applies to all aspects of our lives. Money is a form of energy, so is physical vitality, time, enjoyment, creativity and support. These can all be tapped into to help us realize our goals, or to actually help us live fulfilling lives. Campbell himself wrote that “Money is congealed energy, and releasing it releases life’s possibilities.” Substitute money for any of the other types of energy and the quote still rings true. Physicist David Bohm put it emphatically when he said that how we do money is how we do life. 


This brings to mind an episode of Insecure (S02E01) when Issa Dee (Issa Rae) provides Molly (Yvonne Orji) a simple one-sentence description on the state of affairs that is her life. “D on E, bank account on E, life on E.” I repeat, how we do money, is how we do life.   


In Like Stories of Old, the brilliant Tom van der Linden shares a video titled Life is not a Hero’s Journey where he presents a cinematically compelling argument on how stories and reality are different and that when we try to cut out our lives along the dotted line of the hero’s journey, the end results, for most of us, are cripplingly disappointing. While I agree with everything he says macroscopically, I see it a little bit differently microscopically. What I mean by this is that while our entire lives may not be a hero’s journey, our everyday lives, on the ground, may present little adventures of heroism. Like when you left the safety of your small town with its clean air and endless forests, went to a university in a big, crowded city and sweated your way through your business degree, slaying dragons like Economics 200 and clinging to your books in a desperate attempt not to get pulled into the party-life vortex, in the process. That in itself is a hero’s journey. When we look at it energetically, you took a form of energy, a matric certificate, and turned it into a degree which has opened up a lot of opportunities for you. Anytime you’ve gone from not having something, to having it or even going from being a shitty person to a not-so shitty person then you are manipulating energy. Even slay queens (baddies) are manipulating energy, they are using money to purchase slayness (and all its accoutrements) which eventually gets them ‘the bag.’ Sebenza girl!!! I’ll go later into details of why I think this type of energy manipulation is limited. No judgments, just observations. All in all, we all participate, knowingly and unknowingly in The Hero’s Journey. “Successful people know how energy works. They know how to focus the various kinds of energy to convert their ideas into dreams, and visions into reality,” writes Nemeth. 


Because most of us are unaware of our “energetic potentiation” ability, we equally, but with more insidious effects, are unaware of all the ways that we lose energy. We trifle it away. We may set the goal and intention with internal vats full of energy but by the time we engage in the action that we need to, to alchemize our dreams; we are working with only a marginal percent of the energy we set off on our paths with. In this essay, I look at the ways that I have seen people, me included, give away our energetic power. Interestingly, I use a lot of van der Linden’s points to make my case. Hopefully, on the other side of this, you will be acutely aware of how you are siphoning away unused energy. You will walk away singing AKA’s (We miss you) Energy, operating at the peak of your energy like Tony Montana.   

Because Crips!

My knowledge of Hip Hop is pretty suspect; therefore, I was not surprised when a Hip Hop artist, who has been in the business for more than 15 years, has gone undetected by my radar this whole time. Regardless, I know who he is now (courtesy of the Brilliant Idiots podcast) and the internet being what it is, gave me the ability to transport myself back in digital time. For the past two weeks, I have been consuming as much content as possible on Glasses Malone. What a breath of fresh air this guy is. Firstly, Glasses is this clean, goodlooking, articulate guy who is also a ‘gang banger.’ He is proudly part of the Crips, which is weird for me. He just does not fit into the image of what a gang member looks like or speaks like. Please excuse my ignorance! You guys know that Hollywood shows us what it chooses to show us and when we are kids, we are none the wiser to the actual truth. Take this for an example: When we were growing up, we believed that all African Americans were beautiful. From Sister Sister to One on One and even Girlfriends, we just saw all sorts of beauty. It was only in 1998 when a new channel called e.tv fizzled its way onto our Panasonic 14’’ screens when our views changed. e.tv introduced us to Ricki Lake which shattered our minds because that’s when we saw what the normal African American look like. I remember it like it was yesterday. A little bit of my childhood died on that day. 


This is obviously similar to how a lot of Americans developed a skewed view of Africa and Africans because of films like Coming to America. Most Americans have evolved out of this atavistic view, but some Americans (i.e. #MeekMill) have a way to go, even after exports like Trevor Noah and Elon Musk. Still laughing at some of those tweets from Meek’s social media excoriation. So funny. 


In light of my own ignorance, I took to educating myself, privately and not on X, on what ‘gangbanging’ actually means. Glasses is blisteringly honest which makes him a contentious figure but personally, I think most of his views are well informed and true. He is one of those rare figures who say what they mean and mean what they say… which is quite refreshing. With cancel culture and people’s deep-seated need to stay relevant or publicly validated, it is just rare to find people who tell it like it is. Above all else, what makes Glasses stand out most to me is that he has a code of conduct, standards by which he lives by and does not deviate from. This code of conduct is based on him being a crip. He has a clear picture of what it means to be a man and lives according to these rules. The crips were formed in the 60’s and their definition of what it means to be a man is completely different from what it means to be a man in today’s society. Masculinity has taken so many hits in modern day society, that it is just plain difficult for men to fully participate in society while fully embracing their masculinity. In an attempt to deal with the toxic elements of masculinity, we have gone too far in the other direction; we have effectively socially castrated masculinity in most, if not all, of its ways. 


In the Home-Grown Radio podcast, Glasses is asked what he is afraid of? While most of us expect a hyper-masculine ‘nothing’ response, he starts listing off a number of things that he is afraid of, including flying and surgery. Then he says that because he is a crip, he still does these things, he doesn’t let his fear dictate his actions. During the podcast, co-host Chuck Dizzle shares an anecdote of how they once had an appearance to make, and Glasses had mistakenly underdressed for the weather. To Glasses, there was no question of whether he would make the appearance or not, he would just have to suffer the weather. You know why? Because Crips! All his actions are based on solid principles which develop him as a person and a man. As he grows, he evolves into the best version of himself. For how many people can this be said? 


To say that most of us have a flexible moral fibre is an understatement. We let social media decide what’s right or wrong, good or bad for us. We are always trying to be on the right side of public discourse, even if that hurts or stifles our personhood. We jump on censorship bandwagons, participate in modern-day witch trials, commercialize other people’s loneliness through apps like Only Fans. It’s a lot. While we cannot return to simpler WWJD (What Would Jesus Do) days, when we do not have principles which undergird our actions, then we are most likely operating inauthentically, and wasting precious energy trying to justify our inauthentic actions. Imagine the energy it takes to wake up each morning and have to consult the social media oracle to tell us what is right for us today. Anytime we spend any time worrying about how we will be perceived by strangers is a colossal waste of energy. This goes for the energy-taxing need to maintain our public personas. 


Performance psychologist, Michael Gervais, writes in The First Rule of Mastery: Stop Worrying about What People Think of You

Our fear of people’s opinions (FOPO) is a hidden epidemic and may be the single greatest constrictor of human potential. Our concern with what other people think about us has become an irrational, unproductive, and unhealthy obsession in the modern world. And its negative effects reach into all aspects of our lives. When we experience FOPO, we lose faith in ourselves, and our performance suffers. That’s human nature. But, if we’re not careful, FOPO can take over the narrative in our minds, slowly poisoning us. Instead of focusing on our own thoughts and feelings, we start obsessing about the thoughts and opinions of others, whether spoken or perceived, and this obsession can affect our decisions and actions. And our lives. 


When we have principles which we base our lives upon, then other people’s opinions become a non-factor. Most of us weren’t raised by wolves, therefore there is a likelihood that we used to have standards of integrity that we have wavered from. In the unfortunate case where you were raised by wolves, which happens, because procreation is a biological drive and not a psychological one; there are people around you who had character traits that you admired and looked up to. Like the old lady who used to live next door to you who would always invite you over for cookies or the bus driver who was as dignified as ever when school kids would be disrespectful and rude towards him. Even tv and books offer countless examples of people who are living authentically and whose authenticity has sparked something within us. These are our standards of integrity. They project our highest selves on the ceilings of our reality and help us live in alignment to those selves narrowing the aperture of our energy and focusing it on ways that are beneficial to us. 


“I Need Closure, Bro!” 

These iconic words came from Sammi Sweetheart from Jersey Shore. Yes, I watched the first few seasons of Jersey Shore. It’s true. I know. Anyway, during one of their epic fights in their category 10 disaster of a relationship, when the other housemates were so fed up with all the fighting, she prods Ronnie, with an “I need closure, bro!” He proceeds to give her the closure she wants in the harshest way possible, and she ends up crying. 


Tom van der Linden says that we set ourselves up for disappointment when we look at our lives as stories because stories have a beginning and an end. They wrap themselves up very neatly with a red bow. It is happily ever after and so forth. Stories have closure, most of the time life does not. People just die. People can die when their life is only just beginning, a day after getting married, or as Alanis Morrisette puts it in Ironic, win the lottery and die the next day. They can also die when they are a hundred years old with a lot of their affairs still not in order. Life does not give us closure; it gives us death. More often than not, death is not a period, it's a question mark of confusion or an exclamation mark of shock. A proverbial whimper and not a bang. The need for closure is an energy drain, in that it is a distraction. Especially when it comes to making sense of other people’s actions. We can create entire dramas in our heads trying to interpret why people do the things they do to us, at the end of which bring us no closer to our goals. The first time I realized that closure was bull, was when I, as a female African living in this country with its unsavoury past and a presence peppered with systemic contradictions, became conscious. It was then I understood what Audre Lorde had meant when she wrote that ‘the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.’ I knew that I could not look for equality from the very people who bred and yoked us with such racking inequality. This applies to everything else. 


Let’s return to those of us with lupine ancestry whose childhoods can be summed up with one word: trauma. Trauma exists and it can really do a number on us. We have been led to believe that we need closure on our trauma to be able to carry on with our lives, but I don’t think so. Therapy and trauma work is there to help remove barriers that impede our progress and prevent us from engaging in self-sabotaging behaviours, it is not there to help us find closure. Your dad could have gone out to buy some milk when you were younger and we know how that sorry tale goes, or even recently, your whole wife, whom you love more than anything, conjured and materialized a blindside of a divorce out of thin air. Shitty debilitating things like these happen but you actually don’t need to hunt your dad down or cyber stalk your now ex-wife to find answers. For the former, what if your dad is dead or still wants nothing to do with you? For the latter, nothing your now ex-wife says to justify her actions will make an iota of sense to you. Seeking closure can be an unsatisfactory endeavour and leave you worse off than before you sought it out. Poet Rupi Kaur reminds us, ‘do not look for healing at the feet of those who broke you,’ 


Author Nancy Berns unpacks closure in her book Closure: The Rush to End Grief and What it Costs Us:

From bad relationships to terrorist attacks, the concept of closure enters the cultural debate about how to respond when traumatic things happen… Closure has become a new emotion for explaining what we need after trauma and loss and how we should respond… When I argue that closure is a new emotion, I am not claiming that people are experiencing some feelings that were never felt before, such as the experience of grief lessening. I am arguing that there is a new way of thinking about and talking about emotions… People have felt grief and may have wished that it would end, but ‘closure’ is a new term and new way of thinking and acting on this grief. Our grandparents did not seek closure after the death of a loved one. Closure is a state that people want to bring about in themselves and in others… It has resulted in new products, rituals, experts, strategies and ways of seeing the world.

 

Berns explains how closure represents a part of society’s feeling rules which tell us how we should react in certain situations. We are expected to seek closure even when it is particularly harmful to us. Rituals like divorce parties are widely accepted even though they don’t make sense. Seeking revenge, which is personally destructive behaviour because it drives you to act inauthentically, is also seen as a form of closure. Wild. 


Life is messy and has various interruptions, beginnings, failings, partial endings etc. We can still proceed to carve a path for ourselves in the midst of the chaos and uncertainty. We don’t have to wait for the conditions to be “right” (including finding or receiving closure), or for the path to be paved, before we take action.


Solo Hero

Does the name Tenzing Norgay mean anything to you? What about the name Sir Edmund Hillary? Most of us know who Sir Edmund Hillary is. He is the first mountaineer to be confirmed to have climbed Mt. Everest. Except… Hillary was not alone. If you are familiar with how climbing Mt. Everest works, you would know that people climb the mountain with a sherpa. A sherpa is a local guide who is familiar with the terrain, whose presence increases the likelihood of a successful summit and plain old survival. Hillary was one of two people who first summited Everest.


There has always been a glorification of the lone hero who overcomes herculean obstacles by himself. From John Wayne to James Bond to Bruce Wayne, our heroes are lone figures, and occidentally of the ‘straight, white, male’ persuasion. This is a product of western individualization and Hollywood but if we take a wider perspective of heroism, we see a different story. I was reading up on Japanese mythology and the creation story in Japanese mythology is collaborative. The kami (gods) are pluralistic, and they created two gods (Izanagi and Izanami) who then lassoed the chaos and gave it form and purpose. Even in the monotheistic creation story of Christianity, there is a collaboration marked by the Holy Trinity. The language that is used in Genesis belies the idea of a single creative entity. “Let us make man in our own image,” it reads. There is no one-man-show, and we suffer greatly if we try to do things alone. There have always been leaders, Shaka, Leonidas, Genghis Khan, Jocko Willink, who can only be emphasized because they are pronounced against a background of other warriors. They were able to lead because they had men who were willing to join their cause. They were not swimming in a dry sea. They were not alone. They were not renegades and any or all victories could not have happened without these men. 


When Jesus was captured by the Romans, just before his crucifixion, there was a legion of angels waiting in the wings who would have come to rescue him if Jesus had asked them to. He was not alone. Even in the loneliness that enveloped him when all his disciples were asleep when they should have been praying, he was not alone. On the cross, being stripped of life slowly by asphyxiation, he was not alone. When he felt forsaken, he was not alone. There is something to be said here. When we are faced with great challenges, we may be tempted to respond by isolating ourselves from others, severing the umbilical cord of the support that will help us keep in sync with ourselves and others. When the Buddhists wrote that we all suffer, this wasn’t meant to make us compare our sufferings with one another’s. What I mean by this is that we are told to keep it together under challenges because other people have bigger problems to deal with, that our problems are ‘first world’ problems. All suffering is real to the people who are experiencing it regardless of what the challenge before them is. By knowing that we all suffer, means that we are comrades in life. We can reach out to others because even though they may not have experienced the exact challenge that we are facing, they know what suffering is. Those who love you and are for you, will help you in various ways through your suffering. This is not where you withdraw, this is where you draw ever so closer to your community. This is something I personally struggle with, and I’ve struggled with it because of my previous assumptions (limiting beliefs) about other people. For the most part, people have proved me wrong rather than right. It still surprises me. Your people are for you and your dreams, they are on your side, and they want you to succeed and if you reach out, they will take your hand. Shout out to Ous Sannie Ncube, thank you for being one of my people. Even if, in your most valiant ways, you manage to overcome the challenges without asking anyone else for help, your victory is pyrrhic. The energy that you used up to get yourself to the other side of the challenge was so much that you don’t have any energy for the next leg of the race. This is called living life on hard mode and losing sight of the overall objective. The objective is not to do it alone, it is to achieve the goal. Doing it all by yourself is a path, it is not a destination, and paths can easily be discarded if they lead to dead-ends or in this case, pyrrhic victories.  


Bruce Daisley wrote the book Fortitude which flips everything we know about resilience on his head. Resilience, like self-esteem and closure, are new ideas. They haven’t been there all along. I introduce self-esteem into this list because feeling good or bad about yourself is a distraction, it is an energy-wasting preoccupation. It makes you turn away from what it is that you are supposed to be doing and makes you turn to yourself. I can’t imagine people from primordial tribes spending any time on self-esteem. Everybody in a tribe has a role to play and you just do what you are meant to do, you contribute in the way you are supposed to. You go about your day without having to ask yourself how you feel about yourself. There is obviously a time for reflection on actions, but this can be done without venturing near the perilous cliffs of “how do I feel about myself?”  Even when you do something that goes against one of your standards of integrity or principles, you can rectify the action without drowning in the weeds of feeling bad about yourself. The opposite applies by the way; you can do good and achieve all manner of exceptional achievements without having an inflated sense of self. Just yesterday, YouTube’s Tom Bilyeu shared this on his YouTube community, “Build your self-esteem around your willingness to acknowledge your inadequacies in service of constant improvement. Sounds obvious, but most people build their self-esteem around being right. That’s the recipe for a small life of constant insecurity.” You don’t need self-esteem to improve upon your inadequacies, you just need a willingness to do so.  


A similar case can be made for resilience. When the external environment becomes unbearably hard, the individual is expected to take personal responsibility for their inability to deal with the environment. If you work in a stressful environment and you become stressed (shocking!) from working in said environment, you are completely to blame for your inability to cope with the environment. You don’t have resilience and it is your fault. From what I hear, corporate South Africa is a caustic environment for black professionals. There are many who succumb and leave it altogether, and there are those who soldier on but who pay a heavy price for doing so. The suited soldiers are seen as resilient even if they are underpaid, overworked, overlooked, tolerated, undermined etc…There is also a systemically ingrained practice where black people view other black people in the same position as adversaries instead of allies, which leads to the isolation I referred to earlier. When you suffer by yourself in such hostile environments, it is only a matter of time before you break. 


Sure, resilience is the ability to bounce back from setbacks, but according to Daisley, this definition is incomplete. It is the ability to bounce back from setbacks, not as an individual, but with the help of others. The black professionals who are able to stay in corporate South Africa and flourish are well connected with other black professionals. They have overcome their inclinations to avoid other black people and have formed a corporate coalition. They have drawn strength from one another. It is not surprising that the group of people who have overcome apartheid in South Africa the best is the most collaborative and supportive (of each other). These are people who have not just concentrated on self-interest but on the interests of the entire group. Resilience is not an individual responsibility; it is cultivated within the context of a community. 


Rebecca Solnit wrote A Paradise Built in Hell where she studied how people respond in the aftermath of natural disasters.  “In the wake of an earthquake, a bombing, or a major storm, most people are altruistic, urgently engaged in caring for themselves and those around them, strangers and neighbours as well as friends and loved ones,” she found. This is resilience at work, being fashioned and fashioning us in turn. We don’t have to wait until hell’s fires incinerate our front doors to create these paradises, we can do so right now. We can surround ourselves with people who embody the values we admire and have our energies restored by others as we do our part to restore the energies of others as well. 


Anytime you watch a Lifetime movie, you are reminded that there are actually people who don’t have the same values as you do, and unfortunately, nowadays, these people roll in mobs. There are people who actively seek to destroy the accomplishments of other people, to drain them of their energy. These people take a shot of spite for breakfast and are satisfied with themselves when they lie down to the ashes of other people’s hard work. These are trolls, bullies, racists etc. The people who think it is their duty to put other people in their place. The ‘ok’salayo’ (the fact remains) people who maliciously and with impunity tear down others and when the light of accountability is shone in their direction, all they can say is that the fact remains that they did it. These are energies we must not, in any capacity, entertain. ‘We do not negotiate with terrorists!’. We do not read their comments, and if we do have to read them, we do not reply. We do not argue with them. We do not play their games. We don’t complain about them. We don’t harbour grudges. We keep it moving. 


In South Africa, people use the threat of violence to deal with envy. Let them. People know if they can make you feel afraid, you will spend all your time nursing that fear. Nah, fam. That is no way to live. The late Kobe Bryant said two things which I hold close to my heart, personally, in the face of this type of energy. “Boos don't stop dunks.” Stay focused on your goals. “We don’t quit. We don’t cower. We don’t run away. We endure and we conquer.” It really is as simple as that. Even when people have to resort to taking your life when confronted with your success, freedom or joyful living (yes it happens) as Rick Jade puts it in Still, “you can try to take my life, but you can’t take my skill.” Jacob Banks has a song titled Unholy War and he introduces the song with the following words. “They will come for you/ They will come for your magic/ They will come because your heart glows in the dark/ Because you are familiar but not the same/ Because there is love in your throat…/ So put your dreams in your front pocket/ Use the ones before you as ankle weights/ And raise the sun… Freedom is on the move.” Qualify your support; make sure your garden is free of ankle-biting snakes. 


According to legend, a vampire cannot simply cross the threshold of the doorframe of a house, it has to be invited in. Once it’s been invited in, then it feeds off the inhabitants of the house, leaving them for dead. This is the first rule to deal with energy vampires, never invite them in. And if you have to interact with these vampires, perhaps you work with them or you live next-door to them, protect your spirit by garlanding yourself with the garlic of courage, adorning yourself with silver bijoux of enthusiasm and vitality for your life and spill the rice of a life well lived on the floor of existence and leave them counting the steps of your movements while you rush headlong into your goals, anchored by your people.  


Chekhov's Gun


Another reason why our lives are not stories, according to van der Linden, is because of the narrative principle known as Chekhov’s Gun. In a film, every element that is introduced has to have a purpose. It has to be necessary to the unfolding of the story. If we were to look at our lives, they are littered with Chekhov’s Guns. There are so many things that we do daily, that are Chekhov’s Guns, mostly driven by our need to be entertained. We see entertainment as such a benign endeavour, and also a necessary component to life. We can hardly imagine a life without entertainment. The food we eat used to be fuel, but now it is entertainment. Our romantic relationships and friendships are entertainment. How we raise our children and keep our families is entertainment. The way we make a living is entertainment. The way we spend our discretionary time is entertainment. What we wear and where we go is entertainment. Basically, so much of the way we spend our time is rooted in a desire to be entertained or to entertain. A camera, used to serve the purpose of capturing important moments in life, is now synonymous with content. When Kurt Cobain loudly yelled, “Here we are now! Entertain us!” in Smells Like Teen Spirit, he was encapsulating the spirit of our times: entertainment culture. We have reduced everything into entertainment, and the premise of the interactions we have with one another is based on our ability to entertain each other. Men entertain women with their resources and women entertain men with their bodies. “Where is the love?” ask The Black Eyed Peas. And we wonder why the culture is obsessed with talk around ‘body counts.’ Naturally, if entertainment is the name of the game, relationships become a churn. “Show me a beautiful woman, and I will show you a man who is tired of sleeping with her,” Gina (Clea Lewis) says in Perfect Stranger. When we see each other through the lens of entertainment, boredom becomes inevitable. Entertainment and boredom are two sides of the same coin. 


We view entertainment in such an innocuous light, and we associate it with innocent words like ‘leisure’ and ‘recreation.’ Words that evoke images of souvenir shop postcards, white sandy beaches, glimmering sunsets, and pina coladas. The word ‘entertainment’ should make you think of the wild man in the Bible who when Jesus asked him what his name is, replied “My name is Legion; for we are many.” There are many ways that entertainment shows up in our lives and it produces the same self-destructive behaviour that the demons produced in this man. He was cutting himself up with stones. Our self-harm comes in numbing ourselves, dehumanizing each other, allowing for the usurpation of the most important things in life like love and diverting all our attention from our goals. Entertainment attacks all our energies. It doesn’t just drain us of our money and time, it attacks our physical, creative and supportive energies. Even our ability to enjoy things is compromised by entertainment because when we are hopping from one entertainment medium to another, we are courting restlessness and a boredom that will foster an enjoyment that has one eye on the current thing and the other eye on the next thing. 


Earlier in the essay, I touched on why the whole slay queen outbreak thing is limited in its ability to manipulate energy. It is a symptom of entertainment and is super self-absorbed. As with entertainment, it is all about ‘me.’ It has a rapacious self-interest. It is all about what I can get, it has no consideration for the other. It is transactional and it only gives so that it can take later. It is not just a manipulation of energy, but it is manipulative in its energy which makes it limited. It is unsustainable and only works for a little while. Nemeth writes that when we give with an expectation of return then we are setting ourselves up for anger and pessimism. When these methods don’t work anymore, then we will become angry and pessimistic. When it comes to other people, contribution is the name of the game. When we use our energy to serve others, then we rejuvenate ourselves in the process without needing to keep account of all of our petty little needs. 


Author of Letting Go, David R. Hawkins writes:

On the lower levels of consciousness, which are characterized by egotism, there is so much concern with self-gain that there is little energy or thought given to our effect on others. On the level of courage, we no longer identify solely with the small self. The world is no longer seen as the depriving or punishing bad parent. Instead, the world is seen as challenging and presenting opportunities for growth, development and new experiences. Thus, the level is characterized by optimism and the feeling that with the correct facts, education, and orientation, sooner or later most problems can be worked out satisfactorily.  


This essay is titled The Rituals of the Spirit as a play on the word Spiritual. If everything is energy, then the way we make the best of this energy is through spiritual practices. We keep our spirits intact and are made aware of all the ways that we squander our energy in the spiritual realms. We tap into our highest levels of consciousness when we engage in rituals of the spirit. Self-awareness becomes part of the protocol, and we are awakened to all the ways that we are living impoverished small lives, lives characterized by “feeling unworthy, being invalidated, judging others and ourselves, being inflated, always ‘winning’, being ‘right’, grieving the past, fearing the future, nursing our wounds, craving assurance, and seeking love instead of giving it (Hawkins).” Spiritual practices also help us keep first things first. While entertainment ever widens the interstices of our experiences, spirituality narrows it. FOMO becomes a genuine fear when we are under the compulsion of entertainment. Entertainment peddles a lie, that everything is accessible to us. It isn't and chasing the tail of entertainment is a boondoggle. The energy around us may be infinite but we are finite beings. We have a limited time on earth, and we can only channel a certain amount of energy in our lifetime. Even with money, there is a limit to the amount of it we will be able to work with. It is within these limits, where we get the opportunity to evaporate the nonessentials from our lives, and truly home in on the essentials. 


“As a man’s real power grows, and his knowledge widens, ever the way he can follow grows narrower, until at last he chooses nothing, but does only and wholly what he must do.” Ursula LeGuin, author of A Wizard of Earthsea, reminds us that energy is optimized through the narrow gate of life. More power to you!


Monday, 29 January 2024

His Song Interprets Me

The reality was prosaic in a different way: two gentle souls who recognized each other one night half a [decade] ago and who had never stopped recognizing each other since.

Teju Cole


You have been a sharp presence through it all.


I have been the last syllable of every one of your prayers. 

Over the years, I have gathered all of these syllables and strung them into a song that I wear around my neck like an amulet against fear and despair.  

There is no such thing as absolute defeat while you are in this world. 

While my voice may crack and is at times hardly a raspy whisper.

When my vocal cords are hoarse with pain from beseeching the gods to hear my plight.

Where I have to, in the name of survival, choose between breath and song. 

In my heaving you are still the solace, the bigger picture, the map of meaning on the ground when I have been brought down to my knees.


You've turned anguish into a genuflection.

A crawling into a cradling of new ideas and new prospects.

A petering heartbeat into a metronomic background rhythm cueing in a new song.

An old song revived, defibrillated with a current of charge, sparking an encore.

This time with a timbre of sorrow, a bass undercurrent, a deepening, an added layer of the the shrapnel of tectonic plates grating against each other rising to the top and settling. 


These years have left their scars but the song has an exquisiteness to it, whose rendering stops others dead in their tracks, inviting them to reckon on their own lives.

To interrogate its substance, leaving them wondering if they have truly lived to the point of tears? 

Had they lassoed alligators and almost sacrificed a bloodied limb rolling around the floor of life? 

Or have they just played it safe and dared nothing?


To live timidly clashes with the complexion of my skin.

An affront to darkness everywhere.

You too, wear this resistance and resilience of a skin, a complexion of having danced intimately with the sun to a 90's slow jam. 

A reminder to darkness that we are all too familiar with its ways and we are unafraid. 

We wear this skin as an antidote to being caught off guard. 

The luminosity of our pigment belies a glowing light within us.

A smoldering cauldron of passion and heat always a moment away from setting the world on fire.

Imagine what the world could be when you and I are who we could be through each other.

From where I stand, the world could do with a burning, an overhaul, a clearing of the fields, a renewal, an awakening... a you, a me, a you&me. 


I love you in fathoms that my feet hurt from carrying the fluid weight of this connection.

I love you so intensely that I had been tilling the soil of my heart where two daughters could find root. 

I love you so immediately that I can wait... 


But for now, a new season awaits.

And I have a song around my neck, a song that I will sing as the snow thaws. 

That song, is you.